English
Portugues
Commons
The logic of the commons
There is an economic argument for libre software that is distinct from the philosophical one, and it is worth examining on its own terms.
When a business commissions an improvement to a libre software system — a new integration, a security fix, a feature that addresses a specific operational need — that improvement, by the terms of the licence, returns to the common pool. Every other business using the same system benefits from that investment without bearing its cost. The logic runs in both directions: every improvement that others have funded or contributed is equally available, at no further charge.
This is sometimes described as a commons model, and it has consequences that compound over time. A problem that costs a single business five thousand euros to solve costs a hundred businesses sharing the same software fifty euros each — or nothing, if someone upstream has already solved it. The quality of the software improves with each contribution, which draws more users, which produces more people identifying problems, more developers addressing them, more businesses investing in further improvements. No single party extracts the whole of the value created — it is distributed, by design, across everyone who participates.
The contrast with proprietary software is instructive. In a proprietary model, every improvement is owned by the vendor and monetised in every sale. The user pays not once but continuously, for access to improvements that were partly funded by the aggregate of previous payments. In a commons model, the investment circulates rather than accumulates at a single point.
When you support a project of this kind — through use, through funding, through honest feedback — you are acting as a patron of infrastructure that serves not only your immediate interests but everyone who depends on the same foundation. The libre business tools that operate on this logic are described in more detail elsewhere.